🔗 Share this article

Tehran is willing to reinitiate atomic talks with the United States on condition that it is handled with "dignity" and "honor", Iran's top diplomat has announced.

Abbas Araghchi stated only diplomacy was effective, and revealed fresh requests had come from mediators to reopen discussions with the Trump administration. He asserted Iran did not have secret atomic facilities, and Tehran had not yet reached a point to allow the UN nuclear inspectorate to visit attacked atomic facilities for safety concerns.

Walking a Difficult Route

The foreign minister is treading a difficult route since Iran aims to avoid appear to be acting from a position of disadvantage, and he emphatically stated that Iran had arisen more powerful in military terms and psychologically from the joint assault on its nuclear sites in June.

He was speaking at a security conference in Tehran where he reiterated that Iran had "a fundamental entitlement to refine atomic fuel within its borders that it will never give up" – the key factor of the deadlock in the earlier negotiations.

Prior Talks Abruptly Concluded

The previous five rounds of negotiations between the US and Iran were brought to an abrupt and hostile conclusion on 12 June when the Israeli government, with US support, targeted Iranian nuclear sites in a 12-day war that concluded with Donald Trump asserting the facilities had been destroyed. Following this, Western states employed their privilege to restore international penalties, but Iran maintains they have not had a major impact.

Ideal Resolution Offered

Iranian officials stated they felt they had reached a "ideal resolution" to the uranium processing matter in prior discussions, when it was decided an local partnership with US participation could enrich uranium. Both sides would have been able to claim victory since domestic enrichment would have continued and the US could be assured that Iran's atomic project was solely for peaceful purposes.

It had not been decided in the negotiations that Washington's technical specialists could work on Iranian soil, but that was a logical implication of the partnership suggestion. Diplomats asserted repeatedly they had achieved a deal with the US representative the American negotiator only for the deal to collapse due to "spoilers in Washington".

Current Status

Iran's diplomats declared the consortium offer was now off the table, but it seems quite possible the proposal could be reintroduced in certain ways if negotiations resume.

The American leader recently said he had been getting signals that Iran wanted to restart talks, but in private Iranian officials claim they are not yet obtaining consistent overtures from Washington either straightforwardly or from significant local go-betweens, such as the Qatari government, Egypt, the Omani authorities and Saudi Arabia. The Tehran's diplomatic corps has been criticized of non-responsiveness in the aftermath of the US president's straightforward manner, but Iran asserts dialogue is not part of a performance.

Political Stance

In his remarks to the forum, aimed to paint the US as a dominant force that abuses the idea of international law, the foreign minister stated the two-week conflict revealed the clash could not be settled by armed force. He asserted the attacks started with a Washington's ultimatum for an complete Tehran capitulation and culminated with an complete request for a ceasefire.

Iran is certain the first strikes by Israel were executed with complete American awareness and cooperation, making trust difficult to rebuild.

Diplomacy Remains the Final Resolution

The foreign minister said: "It was not Iran that had abandoned dialogue; it was the United States and the European states that had repeatedly attempted to enforce their desires during the negotiations. Dialogue can still be active and stays the final solution to address conflicts, but its standards, rules and tenets must be followed."

"In case they talk to the Iranian people with the language of dignity and honor, they will get a reply in the equivalent language."

Recovery and Rebuilding

In what is characterized by Iranian officials as the conflict of recovery and reconstruction, the foreign minister claimed he was confident Iran's security strengths "have significantly improved than prior to 13 or 14 June of this year. Every aspect of our defense have been restored. We acquired many lessons from this engagement; we have discovered our own weaknesses and the shortcomings of the enemy."

He continued: "We effectively endured this war. Our nuclear technology, which they aimed to eliminate, continues to exist. The sites and equipment, if damaged, will be reconstructed; what is essential is the determination of the Iranian people and then the unity of the country that they targeted, but did not succeed to shatter. The nation of Iran have developed more powerful, more united, and more endorsing of the leadership and the state in the aftermath of this invasion."